The majority of men are wired to do, fix, conquer, accomplish. The fastest way to frustrate a man is to tell him about something that is wrong that he has no ability to do anything about. Most certainly this includes things he has done in the past but can't undo. Frustration comes out in a vast variety of emotions including anger, moodiness, and depression.
Continue Reading…
Posted by Paul Gernhardt on Sep 27, 2008
It seems that the decisions we consider the most difficult are those that pit our principles against our desires. They seem hard because you are going to loose either way. It seems to me, however, that one is a short-term loss while the other endures for eternity.
Continue Reading…
Posted by Paul Gernhardt on Sep 24, 2008
As a Christian I have to ask myself
what is my responsibility to the non-believer.
Empirical Christian studies would
suggest the process is to inform the non-believer of all the ways
they are sinning. The goal appears to be to tell them to stop being
sinners and, through this helpful corrective education about their actions, for
them to turn to God. I should be concerned, and probably offended by
their sinful ways. Empirical Christian studies suggest that this
hasn't been a particularly successful strategy.
In my biblical Christian studies I find
the process suggested by Jesus is to meet individuals, accept them
without reservation, identify a need, provide for that needs, and
move on. The goal is introduce them to a loving god by being an example
of that love. I should be concerned about loving them and
having an opportunity to help them move closer to a spiritual birth.
Biblical Christian studies suggests that this was a wildly successful
strategy.
It seems to me that if I was able to
get a non-believer to stop sinning they would still remain
spiritually dead. If I introduce them to God they may have opportunity to be
spiritually alive -- which is the only way to open the door for the Holly
Spirit to begin transforming them.
As a Christian I have to ask myself
what is my responsibility to the non-believer. I have come to the
conclusion that I should measure every encounter by how much love and
support I show and whether I have moved the person's heart close or
farther from God.
Continue Reading…
Posted by Paul Gernhardt on Sep 21, 2008
Here is an exercise to try: For one month replace the word “sin” in your vocabulary with the words “bad choice”. If you constantly think about you own sins make this a week. If you constantly think about the sins of others make it three months.
Continue Reading…
Posted by Paul Gernhardt on Sep 21, 2008
One of the most asked questions people
seem to have about God is why he would allow bad things to happen.
Given the shear amount of human suffering in this world, it is a
wholly reasonable question. Unfortunately the answers given by most
Christians simply don't provide a viewpoint which inspire people to
move towards God. In fact, as I watch some Christians weather
difficult times, it would appear that the answers usually are not
sustaining to them either. Both of these results are exceedingly sad.
Allow me to suggest that the true answer to the question is far more
simple (and perhaps a bit more complex) than the typical answers:
The things that happen, good or bad,
are the result of the decisions that have been made by ourselves and
others as they impact the world we live in.
A secular view virtually requires this
position – albeit with a bit of random chance thrown in. Some may
see this view as a prison, others an expression of personal
responsibility, and some as the ultimate empowerment of the
individual. Highly effective individuals understand this relationship
innately. This expression is an article in itself, but for now I'll
focus on the original question.
How does this seemingly human-oriented,
human-powered statement mesh with biblical theology? In my mind it is
a foundational element of Christianity; God gave us free will. He not
only gave us free will but He considered it a critical requirement
for our creation. How can I possibly make such a strong statement?
Consider that before God gave us free will he knew that it would not
only determine the path of all mankind, but that the result of our
free will would would ultimately require the death of His son to heal
our relationship with Him. Knowing this, God still chose to gave us
free will. It must have been incredibly important to him.
Decisions are an simply an expression
of free will, but we often fail to see the consider the what follows.
For us to truly have free will those decisions must have an affect on
the world around us. If our decisions fail to have an impact on our
world then we have only the allusion of free will. For example; if a
parent says we have a choice (free will) to stay home with the family
or go out with our friends, we would expect that a decision to go out
would result in spending time with our friends (the affect). If,
after we make the decision, we are told we must stay home with the
family then it is fair to ask if we have we experienced true free
will or only the allusion of free will. Decisions must have an impact
on the world around us if we have true free will. The cumulative
decisions of humankind has result in the world we experience today.
Wait! What about God's will? Where does
He come into the process if it is we who have decided the nature of
the world we live in? As an omnipotent and omnipresent being, God
must certainly have the power to determine the nature of this world?
Well, yes He does... but perhaps doing so comes at a great cost to
Him. Every time God intervenes in the affairs of this world he must,
by the vary nature of doing so, negate the affects of the decisions
made by one or more people – and most likely the cumulative affects
of the decisions made by many people. God can intervene, but at the
cost of suspending free will for some or all. Considering the cost
that God paid to give us free will, His contravention of that free
will may not come so easily to Him.
However, we know that God DOES
intervene. Given the argument above how is it reasonable at all that
He can intervene? Perhaps it comes when the choices of many people
allows Him to balance the equation. We express our free will, our
desires, through action and through prayer. Perhaps this provides the
critical counter-pose for the choices of others. Through our action,
prayer, efforts, and beliefs we can move the equation and provide the
ability for action and impact. This is completely in keeping with
free will and God's promise. It is clearly the path to action called
for in the bible.
In a nutshell, I believe the following
is a biblically consistent answer to the question of why God allows
bad things to happen:
It is certainly not the will of God for
us to experience the turmoil, trouble, and pain of this world.
Originally he had a perfect world created for us to live in – the
Garden of Eden. There was no death, no disease, no pain, no turmoil.
However, through their free will Adam and Eve made a decision that
caused them, and us, to loose that perfect living place. Every
decision of every person who followed has helped shape the world we
live in today. Be very clear as well that every decision we make
works to shapes the world for for us... and everyone else.
One might view the bible as God's
instructions on how to make good decisions, loving decisions, that
result in good and Godly affects on ourselves, those around us, and
the world itself.
On a final note allow me touch on
another of the most asked questions people seem to have about God:
Why would God send some people to to hell? Oddly enough the above
discussion answers that question as well: free will. According to the
bible we are given the choice of living with or without God. We have
an entire life on earth to make that decision. As painful as it may
be for Him, God will honor whatever our decision is --- for all
eternity. He's pretty consistent isn't he.
Continue Reading…
Posted by Paul Gernhardt on Sep 19, 2008